Overexposure of radiation workers


Print View Posted on: 01 April 2015

Event Date: 28 February 2014 Event Type: Radiation Source
Event Location: Australia, Queensland field site west of Chinchilla INES Rating: 3 (Final)

After an engineer and two operators had completed the logging operation and prepared the rig floor for lifting the logging source, logging tools were brought back to surface. The two radioactive logging sources, Cs-137 and Am241-Be, were unloaded from the logging tools by the engineer.

Unknown to the engineer, the Cs-137 source (54 GBq) was not secured in its shielding and was left lying on the rig floor. The two source shields, one unknowingly empty, were brought down from the rig floor and secured inside the logging truck. The barriers and radiation signs that erected prior to lifting the logging tools were removed.

An operator remained on the rig floor to dismantle the logging tools. He spent approximately 5 minutes kneeling next to the tool box preparing the tools for dismantling the logging tools. It was presumed that during this time the logging source was (unknowingly) in close proximity to his lower leg.

After this period of time, and seeing that the signs had been removed, the drilling crew consisting of two drillers went up to the rig floor to help the operator dismantle the tools.

After spending approximately 10 minutes on the rig floor dismantling the tools, a driller saw the logging source lying on the floor next to the well, approximately 1m from where he was standing. Not knowing what it was, he picked it up and inspected it for around 45 seconds, before handing it to the operator. The operator inspected the source and after seeing the serial number realised it was a logging source. Confirmed by another operator, the source was placed back to the shielding.

All personnel were admitted to a regional hospital for monitoring and released after three days. About 7 days after exposure, operator #1 noticed hair loss on his lower left leg. After a further 8 days (15 days after exposure) he developed a rash on that area followed by painful ulceration.

Calculated doses were as follows.

Engineer - 0.18 mSv whole body dose
Operator #1 - 2.7 mSv whole body dose, 4-13 Sv equivalent dose to leg, 510 mSv to hand
Operator #2 - 53 mSv equivalent dose to hand
Driller - 0.9 mSv whole body dose, 570 mSv equivalent dose to hand.

The nature of the leg injury to operator #1 suggested a dose of about 15 Gy to the skin and nearby tissue.

INES Rating: 3 - Serious incident (Final) as per 31 March 2015
Release beyond authorized limits? No
Overexposure of a member of the public? No
Overexposure of a worker? Yes

Contamination spread within the facility? No
Damage to radiological barriers (incl. fuel damage) within the facility? No

Degradation of Defence In-Depth No

Person injured physically or casualty? Yes
Is there a continuing problem? No

Vaz Mottl
Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency

vaz.mottl@arpansa.gov.au
Site Sponsors
Site Sponsors: IAEA, NEA and WANO
This site is hosted by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and co-sponsored by the Nuclear Energy Agency of the Organization of Economic Cooperation Development (OECD/NEA) and World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO).
Disclaimer
This site is hosted by the IAEA, however, event reports are filed and updated by authorities in participating countries, which remain responsible for all related content. Read more >